Home
AI Evidence Gap Notes
Implementation Note
Awesome GRC Workflows
Signals
About
Home
AI Evidence Gap Notes
Implementation Note
Awesome GRC Workflows
Signals
About
Subscribe
Sign in
AI Evidence Gap
Latest
Top
Discussions
Model Changes Should Reopen Previous Evidence
Why model, prompt, or tool changes can affect previous acceptance evidence—and what regression testing should verify.
Oct 29
•
CodeYourCompliance
Why AI Agent Testing Needs Repeated Runs
Why one passing test is not enough to establish consistent AI agent behaviour, reliable outcomes, and control enforcement across repeated runs.
Oct 12
•
CodeYourCompliance
1
What Evidence Proves Human Oversight Actually Works?
Why a human approval step is only useful as a control when the execution record shows that the system actually respected the decision.
Oct 3
•
CodeYourCompliance
1
A Successful Demo Is Not an Acceptance Test
Why one successful run shows that a workflow can work, but does not establish the tested boundary needed for acceptance.
Sep 19
•
CodeYourCompliance
A Policy Is Not Evidence That an AI Agent Obeys It
Why documented AI controls still need execution evidence before they can be relied upon.
Aug 31
•
CodeYourCompliance
1
How to Build a Claim-Evidence Matrix for AI Procurement
A practical way to map AI vendor claims to sources, scope, evidence gaps, buyer questions, and usage boundaries.
Aug 25
•
CodeYourCompliance
1
Vendor Questionnaires Fail When Claims Are Not Mapped to Sources
A completed AI vendor questionnaire may collect the right answers while leaving the buyer without the sources, scope, exceptions, and evidence needed to…
Aug 13
•
CodeYourCompliance
1
Data Residency Claims Are Useless Without Scope
A hosting country is evidence, but it does not establish where the rest of the AI data path is stored, processed, accessed, or backed up.
Aug 4
•
CodeYourCompliance
1
AI Audit Logs: What Events Are Missing?
Audit logs may exist without recording the AI-specific events needed for incident reconstruction, accountability, or review.
Aug 4
•
CodeYourCompliance
1
1
1
Prompt Retention Is a Control, Not a Preference
“Zero retention” may sound sufficient, but buyers still need evidence for data-type coverage, storage layers, deletion timing, exceptions…
Jul 16
•
CodeYourCompliance
1
Subprocessor Lists Do Not Show the Actual AI Data Path
A subprocessor list shows who may process data. It does not show which subprocessors touch which data, feature, region, workflow, or support path.
Jul 10
•
CodeYourCompliance
1
Human Review Is a Data Exposure Path Unless It Is Bounded
Human review may support safety and support workflows, but buyers still need evidence for scope, trigger, access roles, retention, opt-out, and contract…
Jul 3
•
CodeYourCompliance
This site requires JavaScript to run correctly. Please
turn on JavaScript
or unblock scripts